Introduction
Imagine having a team of specialized AI helpers for coding — each laser-focused on a single task like debugging, testing, or reviewing code. That’s exactly what Claude Code Sub-Agents bring to the table. Built into Claude’s AI-powered coding assistant, these sub-agents are transforming how developers — especially beginners — write, test, and manage code. Instead of juggling everything with one assistant, you can now delegate tasks to purpose-built AI teammates that work faster, smarter, and in parallel.
What Is Claude Code?
Claude Code is an AI-powered coding assistant created by Anthropic. It runs right in your terminal and helps with programming tasks. You can talk to Claude Code in natural language, and it will understand your codebase and even execute commands to assist you. In simpler terms, Claude Code is like a smart pair programmer: you describe what you need, and it writes or edits code, finds bugs, and more. However, as projects grow more complex, one assistant (even an AI) might struggle to juggle everything. This is why sub-agents were introduced – to give Claude Code some extra hands (or rather, brains) to distribute the workload.
What Are Claude Code Sub-Agents?
Claude Code sub-agents are specialized AI assistants within Claude Code that focus on specific tasks. In the official Anthropic documentation, sub-agents are described as “specialized AI assistants that can be invoked to handle specific types of tasks,” each with “task-specific configurations with customized system prompts, tools and a separate context window”. In plain language, a sub-agent is like a mini AI expert created for one job. For example, you might have one sub-agent trained to review code, another to run tests, and another to debug issues. Each sub-agent has its own “personality” and memory, so it works independently without mixing up information from other tasks.
Claude Code’s main agent acts like a team lead, delegating tasks to multiple sub-agents with specialized roles. The diagram above shows a main agent splitting work between a code review sub-agent, a testing sub-agent, and a debugging sub-agent. Each sub-agent works independently with its own context and set of tools, focusing only on its assigned job. This separation ensures that each agent’s memory (context) stays on track without interfering with others. By splitting tasks across sub-agents, each one gets the attention it needs – improving the overall results for your project.
How Do Claude Code Sub-Agents Work?
Sub-agents might sound complicated, but they operate on a few simple principles. Each sub-agent functions as an independent entity with three core components:
- System Prompt: This is a built-in instruction that defines the sub-agent’s role or specialty. It tells the sub-agent exactly what it should do. For instance, a sub-agent’s prompt could say “You are a security scanner. Your job is to review code for vulnerabilities.” This way, the sub-agent stays focused on security scanning and nothing else.
- Context Window: Each sub-agent has its own context window, which is like its private memory or workspace. This separate context means it keeps track of information relevant only to its task. For example, a testing sub-agent will load and remember test-related data, while a documentation sub-agent will only remember documentation details. This isolation prevents the main assistant or other agents from getting “polluted” with irrelevant details.
- Toolset: Claude Code allows AI agents to use various developer tools (like reading files, editing code, running tests, using linters, etc.). When you create a sub-agent, you can choose which tools it is allowed to use. Each sub-agent can have different tool permissions, giving you fine control – for instance, you might let a database-migration sub-agent use a SQL tool, but keep that away from others. The toolset is tailored to the sub-agent’s purpose, so a testing agent might have access to test runners (e.g. Jest or PyTest), while a writing agent might only need documentation generators.
Behind the scenes, Claude Code’s main AI can decide when to hand a task over to a sub-agent. If a user asks Claude to do something that a sub-agent is specialized in (say, “check my code for style issues”), Claude can delegate that request to the appropriate sub-agent (e.g., a code style reviewer agent). The sub-agent will do the work and then return the result to the main agent, which then presents it to you. This delegation is seamless – from the user’s perspective, it feels like Claude just handled the task expertly on its own, but in reality a specific helper did the heavy lifting.
Another cool aspect is that sub-agents can run in parallel and even coordinate with each other. For example, one sub-agent could be running unit tests while another simultaneously reviews the code style. They might even trigger each other: a debugging agent that finds an error could signal a testing agent to re-run tests after a fix. All this happens without you needing to micromanage, thanks to Claude’s internal messaging system that lets sub-agents communicate and collaborate behind the scenes.
Benefits of Using Sub-Agents
Why go through the trouble of splitting tasks among sub-agents? It turns out there are several big advantages:
- Focused Expertise: Each sub-agent is tuned for a specific purpose (review, testing, security, etc.), which means it can apply deep focus and best practices for that task. A single general AI might miss details, but a dedicated code-review agent, for example, will be very thorough with style and bug checks. As Anthropic notes, sub-agents can be fine-tuned with detailed instructions for specific domains, leading to higher success rates on those tasks.
- Separate Memory (Context): Because every sub-agent has its own context window (memory), it prevents confusion. The main AI’s conversation stays focused on high-level objectives, while sub-agents handle the nitty-gritty details in isolation. The result is less mix-up – the testing agent isn’t distracted by design questions, and the documentation agent isn’t cluttering the main thread with lengthy API docs.
- Parallel Productivity: Sub-agents enable your AI to multitask. They can work in parallel, which speeds up development when tackling complex jobs. For instance, while one sub-agent generates documentation, another could simultaneously run integration tests. This parallelism can slash timelines, which is great for meeting tight deadlines.
- Scalability: As your project grows, you can simply add more sub-agents for new needs. A single AI might get overwhelmed as requirements pile up, but multiple sub-agents can scale with your project. You can have different agents for each module or phase of your project. This modular approach keeps things manageable without overloading one assistant.
- Reusability & Team Collaboration: Once you create a useful sub-agent, you can reuse it across different projects and even share it with teammates. For example, your “code optimizer” agent can be a standard part of every new project. Team members can all invoke the same sub-agent to get consistent results, which spreads expertise and aligns your team’s workflow. It’s like having a standard operating procedure, but in AI form.
- Controlled Permissions: You might not want every AI agent to have full access to all tools or files for safety and efficiency. With sub-agents, you can grant specific tool access per agent. This way, a dangerous or heavy-duty tool (like database write access) can be limited to a sub-agent that truly needs it, reducing risk. Each agent only gets what it requires, nothing more.
Single Assistant vs. Sub-Agents – Comparison
To make the differences clearer, here’s a quick comparison between using one general AI assistant and using Claude Code with sub-agents:
| Aspect | One General AI Assistant | Claude Code with Sub-Agents |
|---|---|---|
| Context Management | One shared conversation context for everything (can get cluttered or hit limits) | Each sub-agent has its own context window (memory) for task-specific info, keeping the main thread clean. |
| Task Specialization | General-purpose assistant tries to handle all tasks, but may lack depth in each | Each sub-agent is specialized for a certain task with a focused role and instructions, leading to expert-level performance in that area. |
| Tool Access & Permissions | Uses a common set of tools for all requests; limited control over specific actions | Each sub-agent can be restricted or allowed certain tools, so you control what actions it can perform (for security and focus). |
| Parallel Execution | Handles tasks one at a time in sequence (no true parallelism) | Multiple sub-agents can work in parallel on different tasks, greatly speeding up workflows. |
| Reusability | N/A – the single assistant’s configuration is tied to one context/session | Sub-agents are saved configurations that you can reuse across projects and share with your team for consistency. |
Examples of Sub-Agents in Action
Claude Code sub-agents can cover a wide range of coding tasks. Here are some practical examples of what they can do:
- Code Review Agent: A sub-agent focused on code quality can automatically review your code for style issues, bugs, or inefficiencies. It might use tools like ESLint or SonarQube to catch problems and then suggest improvements. This agent delivers instant feedback on your code, freeing you from tedious manual reviews.
- Testing Agent: You can have a sub-agent dedicated to testing your software. For example, a Test Writer agent could generate unit tests for new code and run them using frameworks like Jest or PyTest. It will report any failures and even suggest fixes for failing tests. This ensures your code is well-tested without you writing every test by hand.
- Debugging Agent: A debugging sub-agent can help track down errors. It might analyze log files, trace stack traces, and point out where things are going wrong. Paired with debugging tools (for instance, GDB for C++ or Chrome DevTools for JavaScript), this agent can pinpoint issues faster than a human scanning through logs. It then proposes possible solutions or at least narrows down the cause of the bug.
- Security Scanner Agent: Security-focused sub-agents can scour your code for vulnerabilities or insecure practices. They use rules and security tools (like static analysis for known vulnerabilities) to alert you about potential risks. For instance, one sub-agent might concentrate solely on finding SQL injection risks or weak cryptography usage. Having such an agent means you don’t overlook security in the rush of development.
- Documentation Agent: This sub-agent handles documentation tasks. It can read your code or git history and update the README files, generate API documentation, or draft usage guides based on recent code changes. Documentation often gets neglected; a dedicated agent ensures the docs stay up-to-date alongside the code.
These examples highlight how versatile sub-agents can be. Essentially, any repetitive or specialized task in your development workflow could be turned into a sub-agent. You end up with a collection of AI “team members,” each excelling at their own duty.

How to Create a Claude Code Sub-Agent
Setting up a sub-agent in Claude Code is straightforward. You do need to have Claude Code running in your development environment (it works through a CLI – Command Line Interface). Once you have that, creating a sub-agent is done through an interactive command. Here’s a step-by-step overview:
- Open the Sub-Agents Interface: In Claude Code’s terminal interface, type the command
/agentsand hit Enter. This opens the sub-agents menu. - Create a New Agent: In the menu, select “Create New Agent”. Claude Code will ask if you want this sub-agent to be for the current project only or available globally (user-level). Choose project-level if it’s specific to one project, or user-level if you want to use it in all your projects.
- Define the Sub-Agent: Now, provide the details for your sub-agent:
- Name: A short identifier (e.g.
"test-agent"or"code-reviewer"). This name is how you’ll call the agent later. - Description: A brief description of when or why Claude should use this sub-agent. For example, “Runs all unit tests and reports failures”.
- Tools: Choose which tools the sub-agent can use. You can leave it blank to allow all tools, or specify a list (e.g.
Read, Edit, Bash, PyTest). Claude’s interface will list available tools to make this easy. (Tools might include things like reading files, writing files, running shell commands, accessing the internet, etc., depending on what Claude Code supports). - System Prompt: This is the heart of the sub-agent. You can type a custom prompt that clearly instructs the agent’s behavior and scope. For example: “You are a test runner. You run all tests in the project using PyTest and report any failures with details. Use this agent whenever new code is added or changed to ensure nothing breaks.” You can let Claude help draft this prompt and then edit it to your liking.
- Name: A short identifier (e.g.
- Save the Sub-Agent: Once you’ve filled in the details and are satisfied, save it. The sub-agent is now ready to use! Claude will automatically use this sub-agent whenever a task comes up that matches its description. For instance, if you ask Claude “run the tests for my project”, it may invoke your
test-agentbehind the scenes. You can also explicitly tell Claude to use a specific sub-agent by name in your prompt. According to Anthropic’s docs, “Claude will use it automatically when appropriate, or you can invoke it explicitly”. For example, you might say: “Use the code-reviewer subagent to check my recent changes.” In either case, Claude will delegate the work to your new sub-agent and then return the results to you.
After creation, sub-agents are stored as simple configuration files (Markdown with some YAML front matter) on your system. This means you can version control them or share them if needed. But as a beginner, you don’t need to worry about the files – the /agents command interface handles everything for you in the background.
Conclusion
Claude Code sub-agents represent a powerful evolution in AI coding assistance. For a beginner, they might sound complex at first, but in practice they make life easier. Think of sub-agents as an AI development team working under your guidance: each member has one job and does it really well. By leveraging sub-agents, even solo developers can enjoy some benefits of a team – parallel productivity, expert focus, and reliable automation for routine tasks.
In summary, Claude Code sub-agents allow you to break down your workflow and conquer complexity with specialized AI helpers. They keep your main AI assistant focused on the big picture while the sub-agents handle the details. This leads to cleaner code, faster development cycles, and fewer overlooked errors. As this feature matures, it could shrink the gap between what a single developer can do versus a whole team. Embracing these AI sub-agents means you’re not coding alone anymore – you have an intelligent crew at your disposal. Happy coding with your new AI team!
Sources: Claude Code Sub-Agents Official Documentation; Apidog Blog on Claude Code Sub-Agents.
🔗 Links & Further Reading
🏠 Internal Resources from Ossels AI Blog
- 🎯 Groq 4 Is 30x Faster Than GPUs – And It’s Here to Reinvent AI in 2025
Explore how next-gen AI hardware is changing the way agents like Claude perform. - 🧠 The Ultimate 2025 Guide to Generative AI: 18 Tools
Discover top generative AI tools for building custom assistants and agent workflows. - 🛠️ Everything You Need to Know About Python Packaging in 2025
Learn how to structure your code when working with AI development tools. - ⚙️ How to Build an AI-Powered Translator with FastAPI and OpenAI’s GPT-4
A great example of practical agent use for real-world language tasks.
🌍 External Resources for Claude Code Sub-Agents
- 📘 Claude Code Official Documentation – Anthropic
Anthropic’s official guide to using Claude Code and its sub-agents. - 🧪 Apidog Blog: Claude Code Sub-Agents Feature Overview
A practical breakdown of how sub-agents work and real use cases. - 💻 GitHub – Claude CLI Tools
Community tools and examples for running Claude Code in your terminal.